B . L O G

An interesting synchronicity has recently been spotted between start dates of two world wars and Russian invasion of Ukraine, as shown in Table \tbl1.

World War I	1914.07.28	19+14+07+28=68
World War II	1939.09.01	19+39+09+01=68
Ukraine invasion	2022.02.24	20+22+02+24=68

Table \tbl1: Correlation between war dates Let's calculate the odds for this. In every year, there are 12 dates with numbers adding up to 68, so a chance that any war will start on such a day is 12/365.25 = 1:30.44. Not such a small chance, but what is a chance that two world wars will both start on such a day? The answer is: $\displaystyle {12^2 \over {365.25}^2} = 1:926.44$ Now the chance is a bit smaller, but what are the odds that 3 world wars would all start on such a day? The answer is: $\displaystyle {12^3 \over {365.25}^3} = 1:28198.56$ So the odds are almost 1:30000, not impossible, but small enough to consider this as a meaningful synchronicity. However, the start of invasion of Ukraine cannot be a formal date of the start of a world war. If one would consider Russian invasion of Ukraine as the start of the World War III, one should also consider German invasion of Czechoslovakia as start of the World War II (a date which doesn't add up to 68), rather than German invasion of Poland (when the world actually engaged into war with Germany). The war in Ukraine is just the intro (world is not formally involved in that war, although arming of Ukraine by the West certainly is a direct involvement), World War III will formally start when either Russia invades another country or someone pretending to be Russia fires a missile toward a NATO country or performs a similar false flag operation - triggering a direct and formal response of the world. Assuming the correlations above are meaningful, one could then predict possible formal dates for the start of the World War III. I don't think Russia will invade any other country soon. On the other hand, those pretending to be Russia are more likely to be impatient so there's good probability for the formal start date of the World War III to be a date in the current year. I don't gamble, but if I would, I would say 2022.05.21, ±1 month... and would probably be wrong. 2024.02.03
Indeed, someone did try to start the World War III in 2022 on multiple occasions (e.g., drone in Croatia, incidents in Poland). All this came from the Ukrainian side, but they could be used as a proxy here by someone else. Physical interpretation A proper synchronicity should not be based on random or convenient (biased) logic. In the example above, it was convenient to split the year into two numbers but can the two numbers be correlated with physical reality? In nature, there are yearly and monthly cycles and the numbers representing day, month and year can be correlated with these cycles - representing a particular state of a local universe. There are also bigger cycles which in nature correlate with the order of magnitude. Therefore, one cannot just split the number [in a date] arbitrarily and claim there is meaningful synchronicity there. However, splitting the year into a number representing century and a number representing a year in that century should be allowed (elaborated in next chapter). Due to cyclic nature, it is also allowed to discard higher components (bigger cycles) in comparison (although this decreases probability of meaningful correlation, and magnitude of effect). So if dates of world wars are correlated, one could also consider a different, simpler logic, such as one shown in Table \tbl2.

World War I	1914.07.28	14+07+28=49
World War II	1939.09.01	39+09+01=49
World War III	2022.04.23 ? 2022.05.22 ? ...	22+04+23=49 22+05+22=49 ...

Table \tbl2: Correlation between world war dates In any case, one could argue that the sum itself is meaningless - the addition of years, months and days seems like adding apples to oranges. However, this is not the case - this is the equivalent of adding small apples to big apples, which makes more sense. Universes are self-similar and bigger cycles resemble smaller cycles in nature. Thus, if nature does not discriminate between the scales [of energy], the sum of normalized scales makes natural sense. Mathematically, the universe is normalizing the scaling vector in operation. In example, for World War I: $\begin{aligned} \begin{bmatrix} 14 & 07 & 28 \end{bmatrix} \times \begin{bmatrix} 365.25 \\ 30.4375 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix} &=\gt \begin{bmatrix} 14 & 07 & 28 \end{bmatrix} \times \begin{bmatrix} 365.25 / 365.25 \\ 30.4375 / 30.4375 \\ 1 / 1\end{bmatrix} \\ &= 14*1 + 7*1 + 28*1 = 49 \end{aligned}$ A proper reference frame One could argue that a century cannot be correlated with a known periodicity in local reality and that might be true - if one does not consider harmonics. A lunar-solar cycle is equal to 33-34 years, very close to 100/3, making it the 3rd harmonic of a 100-year period. But is century the right choice for the interpretation? The period of a lunar-solar cycle might be a better (more localized) reference frame, but where/when does the cycle start? Assuming the lunar-solar cycles are aligned with centuries, years 1900, 1933.33, 1966.66, 2000 would be the years of cycle beginnings/ends during the last century. This would produce the same sum for the 1st and the 3rd world war as in Table \tbl2, but not for the World War II (the sum would be 06+09+01=16, as the war started in year 6 of the cycle). However, assuming the cycle starts with the year 1907, the sums for the world wars become equal again. This is shown in Table \tbl3.

Event	Gregorian date	Lunar-solar date	Sum
World War I	1914.07.28	**07.07.28	07+07+28=42
World War II	1939.09.01	**32.09.01	32+09+1=42
World War III	2022.04.23?	**15.04.23	15+04+23=42

Table \tbl3: Lunar-solar correlation between world war dates In fact, choosing any year from 1907-1914 for the start of the 1st cycle in last century would produce equal sums. So what is, in the end, the proper reference frame, producing proper dates for us, to properly correlate events in local time? There is a high equality (low relativity in equality) between the phenomena of world wars and there's logic for these to occur at the same point in scale-invariant cyclic time. More invariance there is between reference frames, the better, so perhaps we should synchronize our centuries with lunar-solar cycles synchronized with world wars [synchronicity] (or volcanism) and declare this the year 2011, not 2022. That's how much the world lags behind some of us anyway... Date of the World War III updated. Uncertainty Nature might use leap years in our brains, but that's not the case everywhere. Similar is the case with other cycles - somewhere integer numbers will be used, somewhere precision will not be sacrificed as much and leap quanta will be smaller. Dates can also differ between one part of the world and the other. To take all this into account, for any date here, uncertainty of ±1 day should be implied. Date of the World War III updated. End notes NOTE: This chapter was added on 2024.02.03, updated on 2024.06.19. I don't like to hypothesize about conscious human conspiracies, but certainly it is possible that some kind of human organization is planning world wars or trying to stimulate them periodically, consciously choosing specific dates (specific sums of numbers could also be usable if one wants to communicate a date in secret). In that case, one would expect the dates of failed attempts of world war initiation to also conform to the same logic. The drone attack on Zagreb (2022.03.10) does not produce the expected sum, however, the missile attack on Poland (2022.11.15) does, producing number 68, just like other dates in Table \tbl1! Therefore, conscious conspiracy or not, this should be taken seriously. I, however, do not think it is conscious. If this is conscious, then one would expect for the date of the drone attack on Zagreb to also follow the logic (unless it really was an accident, which I doubt). This is probably a subconscious influence on human minds by something bigger. I hypothesized elsewhere what it is. One could call it collective human subconscious, but this is not simply the sum or superposition of individual human subconsciousness. It probably has bigger influence on individuals than the other way around (I wouldn't say it emerged from individual minds, rather it is guiding these minds and weakly evolving with them). This subconscious can effectively sense future. Thus, probably only dates of events with higher probability of starting the world war conform to the logic. The attack on Zagreb had low probability - no casualties, only minor damage to infrastructure. The Nord stream pipeline sabotage (2022.09.26) had no casualties either (in this case, however, the intention was perhaps not to start the World War III, rather to boost US economy at the expense of Russian and EU economy). However, in the attack on Poland, people were killed. Potential for the World War III here was certainly higher. So when will the World War III start and how it will look like? I recently had a dream, which I interpret as a relative vision of this event. It may be something locally extrapolated by my subconscious but I do seem to have developed some kind of a 6th sense, which is still growing but has matured enough to sense future with high probability of successful interpretation. If the collective subconscious can predict future with great probability of success and it has effect on individuals, the effect is probably not the same and not as big for all individuals. Superposition of dreams (or visions) in an individual would be a good signal of information sharing between the collective mind and an individual mind. And that's exactly what I'm experiencing. It should be noted that all visions must be relative (no vision is the absolute vision of future or past, only more or less accurate interpretation, even if the event may have a high probability of occurrence). In any case, my vision involves an airfield (possibly in Slovakia). As for the date, I do not know it, but apparently there's high probability that the sum of numbers will be 68. If the incident is supposed to provoke NATO-Russia war then it has to occur before NATO dies. Note that Trump has announced the US withdrawal from NATO, which might indeed happen if he becomes the president again (and probability for that happening is high, in my opinion). The US withdrawal would not be the end of NATO (although it could certainly be interpreted as a big signal of pending collapse) but this could imply some constraints on the World War III date. If the aim is to provoke NATO-Russia conflict and provocations originate from a US party then this conflict probably should start after the US withdrawal (see The 3rd Act blog entry for explanation on why the 3rd World War is likely to start at that time). In any case, provocations will likely continue and the one with bigger casualties and damage will probably do the trick.