completerelativity.org blog blog_entry 0 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5718446 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5718446 /authors/Amenoum.html#credits

B . L O G

[ 2021.11.26 ] Chaos in time
MESSAGE 000D: BEGIN
Log entry: Chaos in time
Log author: by Amenoum
Log date: 2021.11.26
The Dark Ages are, among other things, ages of misinformation and this misinformation may generally be time relative. Due to relativity in cause and effect, predicted by Complete Relativity, sometimes what would usually be considered the effect will precede the cause. Effectively, just as the order of phenomena in space can be disturbed, the order of events in time can be too. In example, nowadays, some people claim there are computer chips in vaccines and that electro-magnetic signals of 5G networks are harmful and cause diseases. I don't think that any of this is currently true (although 5G might cause some issues at extremely low distance from the transmitter, depending on signal strength, but this is on the order of cm or less). However, what about future? Could this be a reaction preceding the action? Certainly. Both government and industry have strong interest in planting chips into their users, and, considering the increasing tyranny and truth bending of both, it would not be surprising that this reaction is valid, only misplaced in time. Similar could be said for 5G networks - I have hypothesized that homo.delta is sensitive to specific electro-magnetic radiation. Due, to imminent surface extinction, I find it likely that 5G will be the last globally widespread and used communication technology, making homo.delta sensitive most strongly to 5G frequencies. Since homo.beta species (current human inhabitants of the Earth's surface) should be evolving into homo.delta, it would not be surprising that even homo.beta, at some point, with accelerated evolution, becomes sensitive too to 5G, to some extent. There are more examples. A good one is the chemtrails conspiracy. The trails being left behind by aircraft may be benign at this point, but what about the future? Humans are effectively doing nothing to stop climate change so the only option (but not a real solution of course) left will soon be (if not already) geoengineering of climate. On top of that, there probably will be many wars of different scales raging about the globe during the time as well. Therefore, there probably will be a lot of spraying in the air and, due to ubiquitous panic and disarray, who knows who all will be spraying and what. With the haste, appliance of untested chemicals may be likely. Many conspiracy theories actually become true even though many may not be true at the time they originate. When one thinks about it, nature has probably evolved to misplace (de-synchronize) highly correlated events in time for a reason. If, for example, conspiracy theories would be true at the time they spring up, people might take them seriously and there would be no future for the conspiracy. With time displacement, however, most won't take them seriously until it becomes too late to prevent them. The conspiracy actually has a significantly higher chance to become true if it is theorized in advance. This is like standard embryonic development or coding, where the conspiracies crucial for development are coded, or effectively coded, on some level (although mechanisms can vary - time de-synchronization is just one mechanism to ensure planned development). Thus, there is not only a lot of global warming in the pipeline, conspiracies are probably there too (along with anything else important in the context of evolution of Earth). Can ongoing protests prevent such future? Highly unlikely. Paradoxically [for absolutism], it is the lack of such protests that would indicate a different future. Think about it - chips inside human bodies communicating on 5G frequencies would be a natural precursor to natural ability (telepathy) of homo.delta to communicate on these frequencies, especially if these chips are organic. Some people have already implanted chips into their bodies (RFID), and it seems we have already produced biosynthetic dual-core CPU's so precursors are here. I have previously concluded that we are in the age of technological stagnation (in a sense that nothing fundamentally new is coming out) and that current generations of transistors are likely the last [commercially available] transistors developed by man. However, what will prevent the man to use transistors already existing in nature? This is the technology of future. Organic computers might be marketed as great new human invention but there's not much new and original there. The idea already exists to use living neurons as components in organic computers (see reference above), but why even bother to exploit natural transistors if it becomes easier to exploit whole organic computers built by nature - living brains? For now, there might be ethical and moral issues, but once people transform into homo.gamma, this becomes a matter of time.
MESSAGE 000D: END